• July 24, 2024

The World Is Astounded by New Japanese-Made Fighter Jets

According to Japanese Defense Minister Taro Kono, the country’s next fighter plane must be capable of carrying more air-to-air missiles than the current Lockheed Martin F-35 stealth fighter.

 

Không có mô tả.

 

“We will prioritize network functions while demanding high stealth performance,” Kono told reporters. “It will be capable of carrying more missiles than the F-35.” It should come as no surprise that this is a requirement. One of the most common complaints from F-35 operators is the aircraft’s limited weapon capacity while in stealth mode. In its current configuration, the conventional-takeoff F-35A can only carry four AIM-120 air-to-air missiles in its internal bays. The presence of external weapons has a significant impact on the radar signature produced by an aircraft. A radar-evading fighter needs to carry its munitions internally so that it can maintain its stealthy characteristics. However, this may place restrictions on a plane’s loadout, which may put it at a disadvantage in a fierce battle where every missile counts.

 

Không có mô tả.

 

Russian and Chinese fighter aircraft that are not stealthy and are of an older generation are capable, in certain configurations, of carrying a dozen or more air-to-air missiles. It appears that both the Russian Su57 stealth fighter and the Chinese J-20 stealth fighter are capable of carrying six missiles within their internal bays. The F-22, which is used by the United States Air Force and is also a product of Lockheed, has bays that are capable of holding eight missiles. The superior missile capacity of a conventional fighter design played a role in the decision of the United States Air Force to begin purchasing upgraded Boeing F-15EXs in parallel with their ongoing purchases of F-35s. The first eight of potentially 144 F-15EX will be purchased by the Air Force in the year 2020. The military organization already maintains a fleet of approximately 200 F-35As and has been purchasing additional examples at a rate of approximately 50 per year. Both the F-15EX and the F-35A have a price tag of approximately $100 million

 

Không có mô tả.

 

The additional weight and resistance to movement caused by twenty-two missiles would render this loadout undesirable for use in everyday activities. However, an F-15EX can easily carry into battle twice or even three times as many missiles as an F-35 can, even with a much smaller missile load than the F-35 can carry.

This design would combine the airframe of the F-22 stealth fighter with the sensors and electronics of the F-35

If Japan wants its new F-3 fighter to be able to carry more missiles, it will either need to develop a stealth fighter with a layout comparable to that of the F-22 or acquire a non-stealthy plane in the same class as the F-15EX. Neither option is ideal.

It is not a coincidence that Lockheed has proposed to the Japanese industry that they collaborate on the development of an F-3 design. This design would combine the airframe of the F-22 stealth fighter with the sensors and electronics of the F-35. But it’s important to keep in mind that Japan already has around 200 older F-15Js in its inventory.

 

Không có mô tả.

 

While the Japanese government considers its options, Lockheed Martin is working to increase the number of missiles that can be carried by the F-35. According to company spokesman Michael Friedman, who spoke with Breaking Defense, Lockheed Martin has matured design concepts in order to integrate six air-to-air missiles within the internal weapons bays of the F-35A and F-35C variants. This was accomplished through the company’s own internal research and development over the course of the last several years.

“This effort allows for further enhancement of the F-35’s lethality and survivability by increasing internal weapons capacity by two additional missiles while maintaining a very low-observable stealth configuration,”

But in order to implement the concept, the internal configuration of the F-35 needs to be altered. It is not entirely clear whether any of the F-35 operators have been willing to pay for the changes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *